Are the new “environmentally friendly” plastics made with Genetically Modified Organisms?
Question: Are the new “environmentally friendly” plastics made with Genetically Modified Organisms?
I find most of them being made from corn and non organic corn is one of the most GMO crops on the planet.
Check out the dangers of GMO. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94d-KVorSHM
Answer:
Answer by lordkelvin
What would it matter if they were?
I was watching Food Network and they said environmental friendly plastics are made from corn so they are biodegradable. They also noted not to try to eat it, haha
Just a friendly FYI (not designed to crush your hopes for the world like squashing a grape beneath a sledge hammer, but…)
Whenever you read a consumer product label that claims it’s “environmentally friendly,” that their way of proclaiming that their product won’t screw up the planet “as bad” as their previous ones that are still on the market “competing” with their new “eco-friendly” newbie (“eco” anything equals a rush to the store by wishful-thinking “eco-minded” concerned citizens who drive miles out of their way to Wal-Mart in their SUV’s to buy these “eco-friendly” products…)
Don’t be fooled…
It just means the landfills will fill up with “friendlier” stuff that won’t leach poison into the groundwater, but will never decay, and cause problems for us humans in the future in ways we haven’t even thought of yet…(that’s how all the current contamination is occurring…we didn’t know our nations underground gas tanks at gas stations across the planet would slowly leak toxic gasoline into our ground water, making drinking or bathing with water out of the our own faucets a health hazard…)
(sigh)…
Does that mean you can eat them and it won’t make you sick?
There is no such thing as non-organic corn.
What difference does it make?
You really should consider that your government can jail you at any moment for any reason and rhetorically call it a “child support” issue without a trial but rather a “civil hearing”. So no jury protects you, period. No lawyer protects you, period. No cop protects you, PERIOD.
Getting smarter yet?
You are asking to be attacked by financial powers far greater than you yourself can deal with in a civil court environment. You have no checks nor ballances with regard to your judge’s powers to jail.
The civil judge has no protection from biggoted bodies himself either. His arm is often twisted. His options in resisting such twisting are few.
No member of Congress controls more money than those that own drug cartels and sex industry cartels (those that own by default those publicly owned companies you are “complaining about”). No cop resists what he cannot see. No cop can find any order to jail any US citizen in a privatized prison after the gag orderers are issued and the private prisons for hard labor and “prison over-crowding” are founded. No FBI man can resist “lawfull orders” to refuse to look at drug deals with “CIA assets” as the Department of Justice have admitted to ‘in the past’ waiving prosecution thereof. In short, your “representative government” went back to “old fassioned” law (feudalizm).
JFK did a survey of prisons in the USA. JFK found and published the findings of such travesties as applied Vagrancy Laws. Some 70% if I recall correctly of all prisoners in the USA in 1961 were in jail for innability to produce on the spot $ 5 ON THEIR PERSON. The sentances available were precisely as those for “Child Support Order” violation; both are civil “crimes” punishable by 6 months at hard labor and more. But both are extendable sentances. In 1961, it was proved the average life expectancy was 2 years, and vertually none prosecuted were ever released.
Yes, figures don’t lie.
But liars can figure. And such “judges”, knowing they could get slaves only if they lied would arrest and release “vagrants” all the time, back then, simply to confound those who ever considered the issue of vagrancy.
Why limit a judge’s powers when so much anecdotal information stood to “prove” that judges did not ever arrest, convict and keep jailed at hard labor millions of men and women?
Well, JFK found there were in effect deliberately artificial catch and release programs for vagrancy. The judges in high visability cases let the bums go. This only served to convince the public that judges needed more power, not less; but the reality was entirely different than public perceptions of reality ! Judges in reality were making a whole bunch of people die on chain gangs and in labor prisons.
It took courage to publish that the entire court system had been corrupt forever. JFK did so.
GWB, however, likes the old ways. Ronald Reagan liked the old ways.
We are now back to vagrancy by another “rhetoric”. Child Support orders are in fact a means of causing vagrancy, as well as a means of hiding the act of jailing for pure adulterated biggotry.
Yet you persist in sticking your head in the sand, no doubt listening to reruns on the TV, of times before Ronald Reagan’s Revolution. But laws have changed.
Face facts. What you feel doesn’t matter. What you want doesn’t matter. Your government has adopted “the re-education camp” mentality of Communist China; which they got from the GOOD ‘OL USA, back before JFK reformed AMERICAN justice to actually mean justice. Don’t volunteer for re-education. Stop complaining. Silently build opposition; vote the bastards out and reinstate sanity as a political norm. Understand that Liberal Tax and Spend means your cops work for you, rather than the multi-national corporation your judge insists be your boss, because “deadbeats” have no right to a business license (and laws forbid him to invest in corporations here as he might have to rule on them, but he can get richer by investing in foreign concerns especially if he ruins American Concerns – which he rules against constantly).
Your judge is under the carrot and stick. He looses office if he complains, he gets rich if he acts as a foreign spy.